Recorded by the operator as BACK WATER CHANNEL, Poole Harb. The outfall is 74 m from the Little Channel on the Ordnance Survey river network, which is the river this page groups it under.
The monitor for overflow WSX10060 (operator listed as Wessex Water) reports no current spill. The data records no discharge events in the last 30 days.
📍 50.71385°, -1.99474°
Recent spill events· last 30 days
No spill events recorded in the last 30 days.
Rain at the nearest gauge· 6.1 km away
The nearest Environment Agency rain gauge, Alderney, is 6.1 km from this overflow. It recorded 4.7 mm in the last 48 hours.
Day (UTC)
Rain
17 Oct 2026
0.0 mm
16 Oct 2026
4.6 mm
15 Oct 2026
0.1 mm
14 Oct 2026
0.1 mm
13 Oct 2026
1.5 mm
12 Oct 2026
10.0 mm
11 Oct 2026
0.8 mm
Rainfall comes from 15-minute Environment Agency readings rolled into hourly and daily totals; the 48-hour figure rests on 180 of 192 possible readings. The gauge is 6.1 km from this overflow, so it may not match the rain at the site itself, and the latest day may be incomplete. Rain figures do not show whether a discharge was permitted; that is a matter for the regulator. How we keep the record.
River level and flow nearby· 6.6 km away
Latest readings at the Environment Agency gauge "Branksome", on the Bourne Stream, which is 6.6 km from this overflow.
River flow0.05214 h ago · falling over 24 h
These are the Environment Agency's own gauge readings at the named station, shown for context. The station measures the river, not this overflow, and a reading does not show whether a discharge occurred or was permitted. Trend compares the latest reading with the one nearest 24 hours earlier; a change of 5% or less is shown as steady. How we keep the record.
Nearby water quality· 6 sampling points within 5 km
SW-50950217 · SALINE WATER - ESTUARINE SITES - NON BATHING/SHELLFISH
POOLE HARBOUR FOUR POOLE BRIDGE
197 m away
No swimmer-relevant measurements available.
SW-50950230 · SALINE WATER - ESTUARINE SITES - NON BATHING/SHELLFISH
POOLE HARBOUR HAMWORTHY PARK
507 m away
No swimmer-relevant measurements available.
SW-PLHABINN · SALINE WATER - ESTUARINE SITES - NON BATHING/SHELLFISH
POOLE HARBOUR INNER
650 m away
No swimmer-relevant measurements available.
SW-PLHABOUT · SALINE WATER - ESTUARINE SITES - NON BATHING/SHELLFISH
POOLE HARBOUR OUTER
727 m away
No swimmer-relevant measurements available.
SW-50940246 · SALINE WATER - NON DESIGNATED BATHING BEACHES
POOLE HARBOUR AT HAMWORTHY PARK
1.0 km away
No swimmer-relevant measurements available.
SW-50950249 · SALINE WATER - ESTUARINE SITES - NON BATHING/SHELLFISH
POOLE HARBOUR THREE WAREHAM CHANNEL AT HUTCHINS BUOY NO. 71
1.6 km away
No swimmer-relevant measurements available.
Take action
The record above is verifiable from public Environment Agency and water-company data. Three official accountability channels — pre-filled with the evidence on this page.
Are you here right now?
If you can see foam, sewage debris, dead fish, or smell something wrong — submit a citizen report. Confirmed reports are added to the Truth Engine and strengthen the public record on this overflow.
The official complaints route. Most companies require submission through their web form rather than email — open the form, then paste the pre-filled letter.
Subject: Storm overflow WSX10060 on the BACK WATER CHANNEL, Poole Harb: request for information
Dear Wessex Water,
I am writing about storm overflow WSX10060 on the BACK WATER CHANNEL, Poole Harb.
Environment Agency storm overflow monitoring data for overflow WSX10060 on the BACK WATER CHANNEL, Poole Harb (operator listed as Wessex Water) records no spill events starting between 17 September 2026 and 17 October 2026.
As of 17 October 2026 at 22:21 UTC, the monitor does not report the overflow as spilling.
Further details from the public record:
- On the Little Channel, per the OS Open Rivers network (Ordnance Survey, Open Government Licence)
- Location: 50.71385, -1.99474
- Sources: Environment Agency National Storm Overflow Hub and Water Quality Archive (Open Government Licence v3.0), cross-referenced via River Truth (https://rivertruth.co.uk/overflow/7728)
These figures are taken from public monitoring data as published and may be revised by the publisher. They are not a finding that any permit condition has been breached.
[Add your personal context here, for example how you use this stretch of water.]
Please could you tell me:
1. Whether the monitoring record summarised above is accurate and complete
2. What work, if any, is planned at this overflow, and on what timeline
3. What measures are in place to reduce spills from this overflow in future
[Delete if not applicable: I have copied the Environment Agency, Ofwat and my MP into this correspondence.]
Yours faithfully,
[Your name]
[Your address]
[Your customer reference if you are a Wessex Water customer]
2. Write to the MP for this stretch
This overflow sits in the Poole constituency — currently represented by Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour). Click below to open WriteToThem with the letter copied to your clipboard — paste it into the message box.
Prefer to write to the MP for where you live? Enter your postcode and we'll redirect WriteToThem accordingly.
Preview the letter
Subject: Constituent query: storm overflow WSX10060 on the BACK WATER CHANNEL, Poole Harb
Dear [your MP, WriteToThem will fill this in],
I am writing as your constituent about public storm overflow monitoring data for our area.
Environment Agency storm overflow monitoring data for overflow WSX10060 on the BACK WATER CHANNEL, Poole Harb (operator listed as Wessex Water) records no spill events starting between 17 September 2026 and 17 October 2026.
As of 17 October 2026 at 22:21 UTC, the monitor does not report the overflow as spilling.
Further details from the public record:
- On the Little Channel, per the OS Open Rivers network (Ordnance Survey, Open Government Licence)
- Location: 50.71385, -1.99474
- Sources: Environment Agency National Storm Overflow Hub and Water Quality Archive (Open Government Licence v3.0), cross-referenced via River Truth (https://rivertruth.co.uk/overflow/7728)
These figures are taken from public monitoring data as published and may be revised by the publisher. They are not a finding that any permit condition has been breached.
[Add your personal context here, for example how you and your family use this stretch of water.]
I would like to ask:
1. Whether you support strengthening the regulatory regime for storm overflows, and monitor coverage in particular
2. Whether you would raise the monitoring data for this overflow with the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the Environment Agency or Ofwat
Yours sincerely,
[Your name]
[Your address (WriteToThem requires a postal address to verify your constituency)]
MP details are looked up live from the UK Parliament Members API under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0. River Truth makes no claim about this MP's voting or advocacy record on water issues — they are shown solely as the elected representative for this constituency.
3. Report to the Environment Agency
For active pollution incidents — dead fish, foam, sewage on the riverbank — the EA hotline operates 24/7 and triggers a recorded investigation.