Yorkshire Water · overflow YWS01330
No active event
Recorded by the operator as Mag Brook. The outfall is 2 m from the Hall Dike on the Ordnance Survey river network, which is the river this page groups it under.
The monitor for overflow YWS01330 (operator listed as Yorkshire Water) reports no current spill. The data records 16 spill events totalling 28.9 h in the last 30 days.
📍 53.60085°, -1.83223°
46
spill events
64h
cumulative discharge
18.7 h
longest single event
2026-05-09
first event on record
In the last 30 days this overflow recorded 29h of discharge. Across Yorkshire Water's 2,185 monitored overflows the median was 0h. This site is in the top 1% by 30-day spill duration.
11.2 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
11.2 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
12.8 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
15.6 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
19.2 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
15.2 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
14.4 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
14.4 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
12.8 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
16 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
16 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
15.8 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
13.6 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
13.6 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
12.8 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
19.6 mm rain in the 24 h before, gauge Brownhills, 5.4 km
Rainfall comes from the nearest Environment Agency rain gauge within 10 km, using 15-minute readings rolled into hourly totals. Where a gauge is further away, or too many readings are missing, we say so rather than guess. Rain figures do not show whether a discharge was permitted; that is a matter for the regulator. How we keep the record.
What the water company itself reported to the Environment Agency’s annual returns for this overflow, year by year. Hours are the total reported discharge duration; monitor working is the share of the year the event monitor was operating (a figure of 0% may mean no usable monitoring data rather than no spills). These figures are the operator's own reporting, not our measurement, and our live record above begins on 6 May 2026.
| Year | Spills counted | Hours | Monitor working | Matched by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 129 | 2,178h | 98% | hub id |
| 2024 | 105 | 992h | 99% | hub id |
| 2025 | 78 | 1,007h | 100% | hub id |
2023, the operator's stated reason: "Not asset maintenance - Hydraulic capacity"
2024, the operator's stated reason: "Not asset maintenance - Hydraulic capacity"
2025, the operator's stated reason: "Performance - SW Infiltration"
Source: Environment Agency, Event Duration Monitoring storm overflow annual returns, all years. Matched to this overflow by hub id.
The nearest Environment Agency rain gauge, Ludhill Farm, is 4.3 km from this overflow. It has no hourly totals on record for the last 48 hours.
| Day (UTC) | Rain |
|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026 | 0.0 mm |
| 17 Sept 2026 | 4.3 mm |
| 16 Sept 2026 | 0.2 mm |
| 18 Aug 2026 | 0.0 mm |
| 17 Aug 2026 | 2.3 mm |
| 18 Jun 2026 | 0.0 mm |
| 17 Jun 2026 | 0.0 mm |
Rainfall comes from 15-minute Environment Agency readings rolled into hourly and daily totals. The gauge is 4.3 km from this overflow, so it may not match the rain at the site itself, and the latest day may be incomplete. Rain figures do not show whether a discharge was permitted; that is a matter for the regulator. How we keep the record.
Latest readings at the Environment Agency gauge "Huddersfield Royd Street", on the Longwood Brook, which is 4.7 km from this overflow.
These are the Environment Agency's own gauge readings at the named station, shown for context. The station measures the river, not this overflow, and a reading does not show whether a discharge occurred or was permitted. Trend compares the latest reading with the one nearest 24 hours earlier; a change of 5% or less is shown as steady. How we keep the record.
NE-49500340 · FRESHWATER - RIVERS
264 m away
No swimmer-relevant measurements available.
NE-49500517 · FRESHWATER - RIVERS
408 m away
No swimmer-relevant measurements available.
NE-49500714 · FRESHWATER - RIVERS
423 m away
No swimmer-relevant measurements available.
NE-49500341 · FRESHWATER - RIVERS
781 m away
No swimmer-relevant measurements available.
NE-49500650 · FRESHWATER - RIVERS
3.3 km away
No swimmer-relevant measurements available.
NE-49500638 · FRESHWATER - RIVERS
4.4 km away
No swimmer-relevant measurements available.
The record above is verifiable from public Environment Agency and water-company data. Three official accountability channels — pre-filled with the evidence on this page.
If you can see foam, sewage debris, dead fish, or smell something wrong — submit a citizen report. Confirmed reports are added to the Truth Engine and strengthen the public record on this overflow.
📷 Report what you saw →The official complaints route. Most companies require submission through their web form rather than email — open the form, then paste the pre-filled letter.
Subject: Storm overflow YWS01330 on the Mag Brook: request for information Dear Yorkshire Water, I am writing about storm overflow YWS01330 on the Mag Brook. Environment Agency storm overflow monitoring data for overflow YWS01330 on the Mag Brook (operator listed as Yorkshire Water) records 16 spill events starting between 17 September 2026 and 17 October 2026; the 13 with a published end time total 28.9 h. The most recent recorded event started on 10 October 2026 at 03:52 UTC. As of 17 October 2026 at 22:21 UTC, the monitor does not report the overflow as spilling. Further details from the public record: - On the Hall Dike, per the OS Open Rivers network (Ordnance Survey, Open Government Licence) - Location: 53.60085, -1.83223 - Sources: Environment Agency National Storm Overflow Hub and Water Quality Archive (Open Government Licence v3.0), cross-referenced via River Truth (https://rivertruth.co.uk/overflow/6504) These figures are taken from public monitoring data as published and may be revised by the publisher. They are not a finding that any permit condition has been breached. [Add your personal context here, for example how you use this stretch of water.] Please could you tell me: 1. Whether the monitoring record summarised above is accurate and complete 2. What caused the recorded spill events 3. What work, if any, is planned at this overflow, and on what timeline 4. What measures are in place to reduce spills from this overflow in future [Delete if not applicable: I have copied the Environment Agency, Ofwat and my MP into this correspondence.] Yours faithfully, [Your name] [Your address] [Your customer reference if you are a Yorkshire Water customer]
This overflow sits in the Colne Valley constituency — currently represented by Paul Davies (Labour). Click below to open WriteToThem with the letter copied to your clipboard — paste it into the message box.
Prefer to write to the MP for where you live? Enter your postcode and we'll redirect WriteToThem accordingly.
Subject: Constituent query: storm overflow YWS01330 on the Mag Brook Dear [your MP, WriteToThem will fill this in], I am writing as your constituent about public storm overflow monitoring data for our area. Environment Agency storm overflow monitoring data for overflow YWS01330 on the Mag Brook (operator listed as Yorkshire Water) records 16 spill events starting between 17 September 2026 and 17 October 2026; the 13 with a published end time total 28.9 h. The most recent recorded event started on 10 October 2026 at 03:52 UTC. As of 17 October 2026 at 22:21 UTC, the monitor does not report the overflow as spilling. Further details from the public record: - On the Hall Dike, per the OS Open Rivers network (Ordnance Survey, Open Government Licence) - Location: 53.60085, -1.83223 - Sources: Environment Agency National Storm Overflow Hub and Water Quality Archive (Open Government Licence v3.0), cross-referenced via River Truth (https://rivertruth.co.uk/overflow/6504) These figures are taken from public monitoring data as published and may be revised by the publisher. They are not a finding that any permit condition has been breached. [Add your personal context here, for example how you and your family use this stretch of water.] I would like to ask: 1. Whether you support strengthening the regulatory regime for storm overflows, and monitor coverage in particular 2. Whether you would raise the monitoring data for this overflow with the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the Environment Agency or Ofwat Yours sincerely, [Your name] [Your address (WriteToThem requires a postal address to verify your constituency)]
MP details are looked up live from the UK Parliament Members API under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0. River Truth makes no claim about this MP's voting or advocacy record on water issues — they are shown solely as the elected representative for this constituency.
For active pollution incidents — dead fish, foam, sewage on the riverbank — the EA hotline operates 24/7 and triggers a recorded investigation.